Nyc Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney
A New York State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording november
In November, New York voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that will allow several casino that is new become built throughout the state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is successful, that referendum will be halted due to language into the ballot question that he claims violates state law.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum features a range ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposal in a light that is unmistakably positive. For instance, the concern mentions ‘promoting job growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting neighborhood governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was approved by hawaii Board of Elections in July.
But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. In accordance with case filed into the ny State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on the employment of public money in the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use general public cash to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the one that is only has taken up problems with the language in the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also view it as one-sided, and religious teams have also noted the language used when telling parishioners to consider social ills that could attend the advertised great things about casino expansion. 继续阅读